I have written for years that which initially was sold to the public as “global warming,” is a huge “fraud.” The name was changed from “global warming” to “climate change” because new evidence showed that the climate was actually cooling.
Falsification of the data by institutions charged with the research was revealed. Their goal was to confirm warming. But the data didn’t support that. So, they changed the data, the ultimate fraud. The research institutions were given governmental grants and wanted those grants to continue. Thus the data was changed to fit the goal.
“Climate Change” is just a scheme of the big western governments to divert tax money and fees to well-connected individuals to make billions or trillions of dollars for themselves. The actual “climate change” has been caused by our sun, for tens of thousands and millions of years. Rest assured, your SUV doesn’t cause it.
The Encyclopedia Britannica writes:
Sunspot activity waxes and wanes with roughly an 11-year cycle. In 1894 the English astronomer Edward Walter Maunder pointed out that very few sunspots had been observed between 1645 and 1715. That was a period of a mini-ice age. That period was called the “Maunder Minimum.”
The Maunder minimum coincided with the coldest part of the “Little Ice Age” (c. 1500–1850) in the Northern Hemisphere, when the Thames River in England froze over during winter, Viking settlers abandoned Greenland, and Norwegian farmers demanded that the Danish king recompense them for lands occupied by advancing glaciers.
Of course, causality is not proven by this. However, it is something to consider.
The originator of the Chicago Climate Exchange is Richard Sandor. He is the very smart creator of the derivatives on financial instruments, which now is a multi-billion dollar business. He said after “carbon credits” (his idea) started trading, that it was a “trillion dollar market.”
Go to your search engine and find out who the initial board of directors of the Climate Change were. You will be amazed by some of the names. Our last president was on the founding Board. Is it any wonder that he wanted so desperately push through the “global warming” agenda! In the link, you will also find Al Gore, Hank Paulson, etc. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2086494/posts
Below is an interesting article from Traders Scott’s Blog explaining the “science” behind climate change.
“Climate Change” / Everyone is on One Side of the Boat
It has become religion to believe in global warming, excuse me climate change. In fact, apparently now it’s been shortened to just climate, as in “climate denier”. Uh sorry, but haven’t we always had climate? When did someone suddenly discover we have climate?
The religion around “climate” is disconcerting enough, but the strident attitude towards anyone with an opposing view is frightening. There have been calls from “reputable” people to prosecute anyone with a different viewpoint.
The “climate” scheme/racket has been built around fraud. In 2007, U.N. “scientists” warned we only have eight years left to deal with “global warming” – oops. (Back in 2007, global warming was the trendy term, now it’s climate change.) Also in 2007, U.N. “scientists” warned us that only carbon taxes will save us. Sound familiar.
So they’re going to take totally fraudulent science, basically fake news, and cripple the world economy, just so the disgusting globalists can line their own pockets. And harm possibly billions of good, honest people in the process. While not warning of/researching a potential climate disaster awaiting us if the global cooling issue is the real problem.
The “science” promoted by the grotesque (in many ways) hypocrites who attend Davos, is generally being used to enrich themselves and their globalist elitist comrades. They could care less about climate change. But how they have gotten most scientists, universities, MSM, SJWs, and mainstream politicians in all countries to join in is beyond me. The ones who are doing it purely for the money is easy to understand (yet disgusting), but how about the others. Like those who are seeing zero cash flow from their zealotry.
And what if the Earth is not actually warming at all? What if it’s actually beginning to cool – significantly? Is a new Maunder minimum staring right at us? Some villified and ridiculed (and brave and ethical) scientists believe so. Professor Valentina Zharkova has done some troubling research which goes far beyond the normal 11 year solar cycle. She and her colleagues are quite concerned about another Maunder minimum, which itself was part of the Little Ice Age, fast approaching.
The current solar cycle #24 is the weakest in 100 years, and is still not expected to hit its’ minimum for several years. And we are already in the process of cooling significantly. As Dr. Sircus shows, even the scam artists at NOAA tried to hide the fact that there has been no warming on our Planet for 60 years.
And there was actually some cooling into 1979, and then some warming into 2010, with sunspot activity. So as Professor Zharkova stated, we are now back on the downside since around 2012. And there are scientists who have proposed that it is not the CO2 increase which causes the warming, but the warming which causes the CO2 levels to rise.
Russian solar physicist Habibullo Abdussamatov has some interesting observations about the hysteria over “climate”. He believes the current theories are a.. backwards. Meaning, they’re confusing cause and effect. The cyclic increase in sunspot activity into about 2012 caused the oceans to warm and then to release more CO2. So it wasn’t the increased CO2 causing the warming, but the warming caused the CO2 increase.
Professor Abdussamatov believes it’s the sun, not the CO2, which should be the focus.
How did we have all of the large warming periods on this planet before the burning of fossil fuels/modern man? The Professor’s studies with ice core samples shows the CO2 increases always follow the Earth’s warming cycles, i.e., never precede the warming.
So are all of the regulations, carbon taxes, and beating up of climate “deniers” going to just make a difficult time period even worse? One thing is certain. Most of the “informed” capital is positioned for global warming. On a big time frame, it’s akin to the biggest speculative long position of all time. It makes more sense to contemplate the possibility of a different scenario. In a follow up post, investment opportunities will be discussed.
OUR VIEW: I write what others have found. I am the messenger, reporting what the major media won’t. Sometimes of course, I interject my own research and opinion with a few sentences, just in case anyone is interested.
The last White House had a semi-secret program called “geo-engineering.” It consisted of spraying very harmful substances from high-altitude airplanes. These formed “chem-trails” behind the airplanes, which you have probably seen crisscrossing the sky on some days.
The vast majority of people believe these were normal “condensation trails.” Well, condensation trails dissipate rapidly perhaps after 5-10 minutes. On the other hand, “chem trails” last all day and slowly turn into a graying of the entire sky as the chemicals distribute.
One major component of the spray is nano-particles of aluminum oxide and other forms of aluminum, barium, etc. These are very poisonous. Aluminum has been shown to be a contributor to dementia in people. When it combines with fluoride, as in our drinking water and toothpaste, it forms “aluminum fluoride,” which is very harmful to our brain according to brain surgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock (The Blaylock Letter).
Go to youtube.com, and search for “chem trails.”
The White House czar Holder, who apparently was in charge of the geo-engineering experiment in the last Administration, can be seen on Youtube expressing the uncertainty of the experiment. He said, someday it may be found that the consequences of the experiment were worse than the disease. Shouldn’t that concern all of us?
You see, they experiment, and we are the guinea pigs. Hopefully, President Trump will discontinue this program.
Apparently, the theory is that the aluminum particles will reflect part of the sunlight back into space, thus producing cooling.
But the science of radiation, reflection, and conversion of UV to infrared, is very complicated. For example, UV rays in snow covered areas, have 94% reflected back into the stratosphere. Question: is much of this converted to infrared, producing heat? Land without snow only reflect 3%-4% back up.
Could it be that the aluminum spraying would let the UV radiation through to the earth, but then would block the heat, infrared, from being reflected out into space? This would give us a “greenhouse” effect, actually making it hotter.
One thing we know from history, governmental programs almost always have very bad unintended consequences because they are not sufficiently explored, and always have a degree of corruption and moneymaking goals for the special interests. The people that are hurt are not important in these plots.
Even during the Black Plague of Europe, which wiped out half of the population of Europe more than five centuries ago, the governments thought that the carriers were the stray cats. So they rounded up and killed all the cats. That allowed the rat population, the actual carrier of the Black Plague, to grow exponentially.
As President Ronald Reagan said, “Government is not the solution, it is the problem.” Most probably, he was right.
You can read more of our current analysis and forecasts on the global stock markets, bond markets, and global economies in our award-winning WELLINGTON LETTER, now in its 40th year.